Green Bonds to Preserve Biodiversity
Communication marketing for professional investors only
Our planet’s biodiversity is threatened by human activity, with the IPBES claiming that 75 percent of terrestrial ecosystems and 66 percent of marine ecosystems have been significantly altered by the impact of human activity [1].
What is more, close to a million animal and plant species are under the threat of extinction. Some 188 governments met up at COP 15 in 2022 to set biodiversity conservation targets, including the aim to protect 30 percent of the planet by 2030, restore 30% of ecosystems, and reduce the impact of pesticides.
The Institut Paulson estimates the annual amount of investment spending needed to reverse biodiversity loss between now and 2030 at 711 billion dollars at the very least, whereas current spending lies somewhere between 124 and 143 billion dollars; this points to a sizeable financing gap that needs to be filled [2].
Green bonds can be used to raise funds for environmental projects and are therefore an attractive financing tool for public and private institutions alike. In 2023, nearly $600 billion of green bonds were issued out of a total of around 1 trillion labeled securities, according to S&P [3].
However, most of the proceeds raised from green bond issues are currently allocated to climate-related projects and few are geared towards financing biodiversity-related issues.
The share of green bonds featuring biodiversity conservation as a use of proceeds has risen considerably in recent years, from 5 percent of instruments issued in 2020 to 16 percent in 2023 [4], but the pace is still slow. That said, the growth trend seems to be a steady one and there are lots of market participants pushing in this direction.
In this respect, the development of blue bonds (a variation of green bonds tailored specifically to marine activities) is a prime example of innovation geared towards biodiversity. The Nordic Investment Bank successfully issued close to 2 million Swedish krona worth of bonds for projects that limit the amount of pollution discharged into the Baltic Sea [5].
It is quite possible that the market does not require any further labeling to steer capital towards biodiversity, but this example shows that investors are taking an interest in this type of investment theme. Unfortunately, blue bonds appear to have hit a ceiling: although there is a great deal of demand on the market, the latest blue bond issued by the NIB dates back to 2019 as there is a shortage of assets to finance, preventing new issuances.
One of the major factors preventing labeled debt financing from expanding is that it is so difficult to identify opportunities and income-generating, assets in the biodiversity arena. And in contrast to climate-related issues, there are few metrics out there for assessing the impacts of biodiversity-related projects.
The reporting standards applied to the impacts of an issuer’s activities on biodiversity are far less stringent and advanced than those applied to climate targets. The European Union has made progress here, but it is essential to continue working to improve transparency.
Policy alignment in the field of biodiversity is less widespread, and initiatives like the SBTN (Science Based Targets for Nature) are still only marginal; all this means that there is no incentive for companies to issue bonds aimed at helping them achieve their biodiversity impact reduction targets. And yet this is an issue that needs to be fully embraced if we are to achieve a truly sustainable transition.
To conclude, if the labeled debt market is to continue growing while at the same time gaining credibility, it needs to find new assets financing real environmental progress. And notwithstanding the difficulties currently being faced, the market’s horizons could broaden thanks to changes to the regulatory framework combined with the introduction of a new biodiversity taxonomy.
Greater transparency will make it easier to steer capital towards the theme of biodiversity, which is so essential to securing the sustainability of our economic activity and especially our future.
Written in June 2024
1 Source: IPBES-Depliant-rapport-2019, French Foundation for Biodiversity Research. To find out more, click here.
2 Source: Financing Nature: closing the global biodiversity financing gap, 2021, Paulson Institute. Find out more: Financing Nature: Closing the Global Biodiversity Financing Gap - Paulson Institute.
3 Source: Sustainable Bond Market Outlook for 2024, S&P global rating
4 Source: Biodiversity in ESG, State of the Sustainable Finance Market, Sustainable Fitch. To find out more, click here.
5 Source: NIB issues first Nordic-Baltic Blue Bond, NIB. To find out more, click here.
Marketing Communication. For professional investors only. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments involve risk, including the risk of capital loss. The provision of this material and/or reference to specific securities, sectors, or markets within this material does not constitute investment advice, or a recommendation or an offer to buy or to sell any security, or an offer of services. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks and expenses of any investment carefully before investing. The analyses, opinions, and certain of the investment themes and processes referenced herein represent the views of the portfolio manager(s) as of the date indicated. These, as well as the portfolio holdings and characteristics shown, are subject to change. There can be no assurance that developments will transpire as may be forecasted in this material. In Switzerland: This material is provided by Natixis Investment Managers, Switzerland Sàrl, Rue du Vieux Collège 10, 1204 Geneva, Switzerland or its representative office in Zurich, Schweizergasse 6, 8001 Zürich.
NATIXIS INVESTMENT MANAGERS Paris 453 952 681 Capital : 178 251 690 € 43, avenue Pierre Mendès-France, 75013 Paris www.im.natixis.com
MIROVA - Affiliate of Natixis Investment Managers. French Public Limited Liability Company. Share Capital: €8 813 860 Regulated by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) under n° GP 02014. RCS Paris n° 394 648 216. 59 avenue Pierre Mendès France 75013







